Playing about with cycle.travel now that I have the OS maps option. I spotted that part of this route is marked as a footpath on c.t. but on OSM it seems to be more correctly described as Unmaintained Track Road. Strange!
Become a supporter
cycle.travel now has Ordnance Survey maps
Plan multi-day adventures easily
Thanks to Swaledale Outdoor Club!
We’re now in Australia and New Zealand too
Stick to tarmac with our new routing option
cycle.travel expands to Scandinavia and Eastern Europe
Smart Turns – new on cycle.travel's route-planner
Playing about with cycle.travel now that I have the OS maps option. I spotted that part of this route is marked as a footpath on c.t. but on OSM it seems to be more correctly described as Unmaintained Track Road. Strange!
Made in the Cotswolds. Published by Éditions Système D Ltd.
Log in with your cycle.travel account:
| Password |
Or simply use your account on:
Comments
In OpenStreetMap it’s just described as a track (highway=track) with foot access (foot=yes). There’s no indication that bikes are allowed on it, so c.t thinks you need to push.
If bikes are allowed, then the best thing to do is to tag it as such in OSM – then c.t will pick that up on the next update.