Download and elevation profile

I have a long route. Split into 44 segments of about 50 kilometers.
I want to download all segments as gpx tracks including elevation.
Some tracks do not give an elevation profile when I ask for it. Downloading the track then also does not work.

Tracks where it works fine:
https://cycle.travel/map/journey/533571
https://cycle.travel/map/journey/533562

Tracks where it goes wrong:
https://cycle.travel/map/journey/533574
https://cycle.travel/map/journey/533574

Peter

splitting routes

I made a long route, over 700 kilometres. There are about 90 markers in this route.

https://cycle.travel/map/journey/627320

I split this route into 12 days. In 11 of the 12 days, no markers are present. In one day, however, a marker is visible. If all markers had been included in this day, there should have been 9. 

https://cycle.travel/map/journey/627325

Questions: do markers have to be included when routes are split? I don't mind if markers are not included, but it doesn't happen consistently.

Strange behaviour of planner

That the phone is not the right device for planning, I know.

But I am on the road, and have to change my route by necessity.

While I'm at it, weird things happen. I modify a saved route, and route points remain. I even suddenly had two starting points on the screen.

I close a route, and the waypoints remain visible.

A modified route, saved under a new name has gone wrong. The modified route shows 2 starting points and 2 end points.

https://cycle.travel/map/journey/584247

Working on Android phone

About Streetview

The Streetview function on the PC opens a new tab in the browser the first time.

Previously, a second, third, etc. time used the same tab each time. Now a new tab is opened each time. If a Streetview is frequently requested, sometimes a large number of tabs are open.
Could this be brought back to the old situation?
Or do others see an advantage in this?

Windows computer versus Android phone

Location, see: https://cycle.travel/map/journey/502411

It is a complicated situation, the area is under construction. Two tunnels are being constructed under the railway. This reconstruction will take until 2026, so it will be subject to constant change. That there will be regular inaccuracies on OSM is inevitable.

Two notable issues. First, the map on Windows computer is different from the map on Android phone.

Windows computer

Android phone.

Second, where CT's cycle route deviates from the cycle path, it follows the route as indicated on OSM. Currently, however, this stretch of cycle path is as indicated on CT. Incomprehensible to me is how CT 'knows' the correct situation. Incidentally, in a few weeks, this too will be different.

Both screendumps where made this afternoon.