
Become a supporter
rotavicentina.com/en/long-distance-mtb-trail/
The main objective of this Long Distance MTB Trail is to connect all the Odemira MTB trailheads, departing from a train station and ending at or near another station.
It is a relatively long course but of a low technical level and so is also accessible to Gravel bikes.
Although it often runs alongside sections of other MTB routes, it is designed to avoid the most technical sections, therefore it has a higher percentage of asphalt, but always with little traffic.
You can start at Amoreiras-Gare Station (where there is 1 train a day), or at Funcheira (with 3 daily trains) or go to Santa Clara, passing 8 km before at Savoie Station (where 3 trains stop daily).
Despite passing through small villages, the route takes place mainly in remote areas of the municipality of Odemira, where you can breathe the peace of the tranquility of Alentejo!
You can reduce the route to 123 km by starting at Funcheira Station and finishing at Santa Clara/Sabóia.
Another possibility is to divide the route into stages.
5 stages / days
• 27 km - From Amoreiras-Gare to Colos
• 25 km - From Colos to São Luís
• 28 km - From São Luís to Odemira
• 22 km - From Odemira to São Teotónio
• 41 km - From São Teotónio to Santa Clara-a-Velha
Using gravel routing in the Algarve recently, I discovered many delightful roads by trusting the c.t routing algorithm. The only hiccup was due to missing OSM tags on a truly impassable section. But of course there was a lot of variability in the quality of the passable dirt/gravel roads.
I added smoothness tags to a lot of rideable, but variable quality, dirt/gravel roads while touring. Later, I noticed that c.t does not use the smoothness tag (under the hood):
We use the surface= tag to determine how suitable a path is for cycling. We look for the values asphalt, paved, concrete, tarmac, paving_stones, compacted, gravel, ground, earth, cobblestone, grass, unpaved, dirt, and sand in roughly that order (the ones at the start are better). You can use the tracktype tag as an alternative.
Should I have used MTB:scale tags? I assume anything gravel-rideable is a 0 or 1 (maybe 2 in a pinch).
I think surface / tracktype tags do not give much information about actual gravel-rideability -- any of the surfaces listed above could be suitable for a gravel bike.
Is the smoothness tag useful?
Thanks.
Richard, I used the iOS app for the first time in about a year and some of the changes you've made are terrific.
A few suggestions/wishes:
Also: on the website, moving between the two folder views (list/edit view and map view) is clunky. I often want to view the folder map, rename/move/delete routes, then go back to the folder map. Maybe there could be toggle for the folder view.
The recent Komoot acquisition (and staff firing) reminds us of the rarity of your approach to the product and business. I can tell it's a labor of love for you -- and I hope the finances work too (!)
Log in with your cycle.travel account:
| Password |
Or simply use your account on: